The Inequities of Capitalistic Banking Systems: A Call for Financial Inclusion and Reform

In the realm of capitalistic banking systems, a troubling trend emerges: the rich get richer while the masses grow poorer. Take, for instance, the scenario where a single bank holds deposits from millions of individuals, comprising 95% of its funds. Yet, who reaps the benefits of this vast sum? Primarily, it’s the select few: borrowers from affluent corporations funded by numerous other banks with their own extensive depositor bases.

These borrowers, typically numbering no more than 500, represent a mere fraction—0.1% or less—of the general population. Meanwhile, the lion’s share of profits flows into the pockets of a privileged 5% of equity holders, leaving the rest—especially those with current and savings accounts—receiving paltry returns, if any.

Effectively, the masses’ wealth, including Islamic and non-Islamic banking sectors, funnels upward to enrich a minuscule segment of society: the affluent corporates and wealthy individuals who constitute less than 0.1% of total depositors. While Islamic banks may shun interest-based transactions in favor of Shariah compliance, their contribution to equitable wealth distribution remains questionable, mainly if depositors receive diminished returns.

This disparity leaves a sizable portion of the populace, roughly 75%, mired in a cash economy devoid of meaningful returns or access to financial services. Consequently, many resort to illicit means to safeguard or augment their wealth, perpetuating corruption, tax evasion, and other unlawful activities driven by the necessity to conceal income and business dealings.

The path to rectification necessitates bold reforms:

1. Implement Real Mudarabah: Establish genuine profit-sharing arrangements for depositors, free from any semblance of gift-giving (Hiba). However targeting a better return to the both parties, Shareholders and account holders, the ratio of Mudarabah maybe worked out in a way to give the both on fair, balanced,  equitable and market driven basis, that means not too high to the equity holders or not too low to the account holders.

2. Leverage Technological Advancements: Harness the power of AI, big data, and credit scoring to extend financial inclusion to the masses, offering them competitive returns and facilitating access to productive, Shariah-compliant asset-based financing. Maybe this short-term masses inclusive SME and productive financing based on revolving and multiple cycles of transitions would be equally beneficial to both parties, to scale up the businesses of these masses and giving the regular good returns to the banks from these masses keeping in view or analyzing the data of each branch of banks of the depositor customers base data of their deposits and withdrawals behavior.

3. Shift from Government Debt to Asset-Based Financing: Redirect funds currently allocated for government budget deficits towards productive ventures, leveraging the wealth of the masses for tangible economic growth instead of perpetuating interest payments to lenders or bridging budget shortfalls.

In embracing these measures, we not only promote financial equity but also cultivate a system that empowers individuals, fosters economic stability, and mitigates the allure of illicit financial practices. It’s a pathway toward a more just and prosperous society for all.